Prediction of Andrea Lazaro Garcia [209th] vs Harmony Tan [284th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L L W W L
Form
W L W W L L W W L LHead-2-Head: Garcia 1 - 0 Tan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Garcia winning 2 and Tan winning 0. The last match between Garcia and Tan was at the W50 Macon, 28-02-2025, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Andrea Lazaro Garcia getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Andrea Lazaro Garcia | 1 |
| Harmony Tan | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
30 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:54:31 | Average Match Time | 0:54:31 |
| 57% (24/42) | 1st Serve % | 77% (30/39) |
| 79% (19/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (16/30) |
| 67% (12/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 22% (2/9) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (21/39) | Return Points Win % | 26% (11/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andrea Lazaro Garcia vs Harmony Tan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garcia 1 - 0 Tan
Editorial Prediction:
What intriguing insights can recent performances on the second serve unveil about our contenders? Over the last half-year, Tan edges slightly ahead in this regard, capturing 42.13% of the points on their second serve compared to Garcia's 39.7%. These figures are often pivotal in forecasting match outcomes, suggesting a subtle advantage for Tan in this facet.
When it comes to return games, the stats present a captivating angle. For second serves, Garcia seizes 51% of points from her opponents, while Tan follows closely with 50.52%. However, the first serve return stats present a different story; Garcia shines with 34.19% as opposed to Tan's 27.02%. Such return game prowess from Garcia might tip the balance in her favor in this head-to-head confrontation.
How do they handle pressure on the court? Looking at breakpoint defenses, Tan has a slight edge, having saved 44.4% of breakpoints recently, whereas Garcia trails with 40.65%. Such numbers might play a crucial role in live match predictions, especially when a game hangs in the balance.
Reviewing overall performance, Garcia's track record over the past year is impressive, with a winning percentage of 71.83% (51 wins and 20 losses), while Tan stands at 60% (36 wins and 24 losses). This suggests Garcia might be the more formidable competitor overall.
What about their preferred battlegrounds? On hard courts, Garcia boasts a 66% career win rate, while Tan flourishes on grass with a 68% success rate. Conversely, Garcia's lesser performance on grass (50%) contrasts with Tan's struggle on clay (51%). The surface might play a vital role in deciding the victor here.
How do they fare against their peers in the past year? Despite playing at similar levels in Challengers/ITF events > $10K, Garcia's win percentage is slightly superior at 71.83% versus Tan's 63.46%. Additionally, the average rank of Garcia's opponents (358) suggests she contends with slightly more challenging competitors than Tan, whose opponents have ranked slightly lower on average (368.47).
In the decisive moments, who stands tall? Should the match extend to a deciding set, Garcia's recent record is commendable, with a 67% win rate, marginally higher than Tan's 63%. This ability to clinch final sets could be decisive.
Examining their breakpoint prowess, Garcia holds an edge, converting 43.75% of her opportunities compared to Tan who manages 36.81%. This could be particularly telling in live-play scenarios, offering a tactical advantage when both players are vying for critical points.
Considering all these dimensions, from second serve efficiency and return masteries to pressure resilience and match-ending tenacity, the scales seem to tip towards Garcia. Her consistent top-tier performances against slightly tougher adversaries position her as the probable winner in this enticing match-up.
Andrea Lazaro Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
87%
(
45 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
51
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ruth Roura Llaverias
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
43 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF | 7-6(5) 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-2 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Harmony Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Harmony Tan
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
119)
0
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Harmony Tan
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Martyna Kubka
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
12 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Hiromi Abe
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Harmony Tan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R3 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
77%
(
30 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (308/193) | Win/Loss | 55% (359/295) |
| 60% (685/458) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (803/657) |
| 54% (5603/4685) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6744/6103) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 349 | Aces Total | 973 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1422 | Total Double Faults | 1120 |
| 1:16:51 | Average Match Time | 1:12:1 |
| 439.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.91 |
| 62% (15825/25359) | 1st Serve % | 58% (19301/33181) |
| 61% (9694/15825) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (12074/19301) |
| 45% (4266/9534) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6319/13880) |
| 50% (1729/3460) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2061/4106) |
| 48% (12225/25451) | Return Points Win % | 46% (14959/32202) |
| 62% (302/486) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (352/628) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 10% (1/10) |
| 48% (44/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (56/109) |
| 53% (78/148) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (77/160) |
| 88% (300/264) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (363/313) |
| 12% (300/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (363/48) |
| 23% (200/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (290/45) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
